<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Network laws and the transparency of emergence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goldenswamp.com/2009/12/03/network-laws-and-the-transparency-of-emergence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goldenswamp.com/2009/12/03/network-laws-and-the-transparency-of-emergence/</link>
	<description>How the best knowledge gets to everybody to learn</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:50:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Judy Breck</title>
		<link>http://www.goldenswamp.com/2009/12/03/network-laws-and-the-transparency-of-emergence/comment-page-1/#comment-85373</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Breck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldenswamp.com/?p=3243#comment-85373</guid>
		<description>Thanks! Excellent point about the untransparent weighting of the ranking algorithm. Still, because a vast number of links for any topic are included in the search results, there is more transparency than peer review which completely excludes most submissions and ideas that are &quot;unapproved.&quot;

I stand by this principle: In an open network emergent patterns are transparent. When Google rigs its algorithm, it is no longer allowing open emergence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:left; margin-right: 10px; display:block; width:50px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://judybreck.com/'><img alt='' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/5de7b6cbce2aeb05f0c7220a75654bcf?s=50&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fgoldenswamp.com%2Fdefault-avatar.jpg%3Fs%3D50&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-50 photo' height='50' width='50' /></a></span>Thanks! Excellent point about the untransparent weighting of the ranking algorithm. Still, because a vast number of links for any topic are included in the search results, there is more transparency than peer review which completely excludes most submissions and ideas that are &#8220;unapproved.&#8221;</p>
<p>I stand by this principle: In an open network emergent patterns are transparent. When Google rigs its algorithm, it is no longer allowing open emergence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Barnes</title>
		<link>http://www.goldenswamp.com/2009/12/03/network-laws-and-the-transparency-of-emergence/comment-page-1/#comment-85365</link>
		<dc:creator>James Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 06:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goldenswamp.com/?p=3243#comment-85365</guid>
		<description>&quot;The search engine principle invented at Google sends to the top of its search results the nodes visited by the most users, with known experts given more weight.&quot;

Until Google publishes The Algorithm, you don&#039;t *know* this is a fact, you can only take Google&#039;s word for it: how transparent is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class='eg-image' style='float:left; margin-right: 10px; display:block; width:50px' ><a rel='external nofollow' href='http://www.morodogroup.com'><img alt='' src='http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/c463284fe0d76a9bf09d465e5ad218d7?s=50&amp;d=http%3A%2F%2Fgoldenswamp.com%2Fdefault-avatar.jpg%3Fs%3D50&amp;r=G' class='avatar avatar-50 photo' height='50' width='50' /></a></span>&#8220;The search engine principle invented at Google sends to the top of its search results the nodes visited by the most users, with known experts given more weight.&#8221;</p>
<p>Until Google publishes The Algorithm, you don&#8217;t *know* this is a fact, you can only take Google&#8217;s word for it: how transparent is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

